DOYOURCLONE VS CARBON COPY UPDATE
DOYOURCLONE VS CARBON COPY SOFTWARE

Nobody clearly mentioned if CCC would work for that.

I was planning to use a block level sw to make backups to my local NAS. With move to Mac, I am now using ChronoSync. They get backed up to a secondary external using bvckup2. All my RAW files are on an external HD for now along with the processed jpegs, Tiffs (based on folder structure). Backup means just copying a folder of files from one machine to another. Same here, never understood the need to convert to DNG. My OS and files-including the image database- get backed up every hour with Time Machine. I’ve never understood the need to convert popular Raw formats to DNG so I can’t speak to that but I backup my images disk to disk with CCC and to the cloud as part of my Backblaze subscription. So has anyone used something like Arq to do block level incremental backups for DNG files? Or better to stick with Carbon Copy Cloner, tried and true, for disk to disk backups? To restore anything or everything I have to go through Arq instead of just grabbing the backup disk. So in some ways this seems more elegant and thrifty, but then it's less straightforward than just having a disk with the actual files on it in the current state. I'm assuming that for the changed metadata it will be a trivial amount of data changed in the backup compared to copying the whole file.

DOYOURCLONE VS CARBON COPY UPDATE

So the thing about Arq is that it works on a block level, so it will only copy and update the part of a large file that has changed. I've used Arq for many years, and it has saved my butt a few times.Īrq can backup to an HD, but I've never done that. There was a big kerfuffle about Arq v 6 having problems, but it seems to be ironed out in v 7.

DOYOURCLONE VS CARBON COPY SOFTWARE

Arq has always been good software for me, except for some glitchy confusion when I changed computers.

I also use Time Machine for that, but Arq runs every hour, and Time Machine runs when I remember to do it. But mostly I have used Arq for a more general Time Machine type backup of my computer. I have used it for photos to a limited extent - backing up folders of new work to the cloud until I manage to get them swapped to the safe deposit box. I also use Arq to do various cloud backups. Carbon Copy Cloner I consider to be extremely good and reliable software. Sometimes I go through the catalog and make a lot of changes, and then the backup gets a big refresh of the changed DNG files. I rotate one of the two backups of these first tier files into a safe deposit box off site if I happen to go to the bank. This isn't too terribly slow, but eventually I always have to cull the 'safetynet' folder of files that have changed. When I back up with Carbon Copy Cloner it will copy all the files I've changed rating or keyword or adjustment in LR to the new disk. xmp or any sidecar file when using DNG with Adobe software. So the thing about the DNG files is that every time I touch anything in Lightroom, it changes the whole file. Henceforth they will be DNG from an A7R4 I'll start using - huge. So the first tier files, the ones since 2016, are mostly. Typing this out makes me think I really should invest in a couple more large HDs to consolidate those second-tier backups. I would have a hard time piecing those back together if I had a failure but I could do it if there wasn't a fire. The second tier disk backs up multiple copies of files to multiple older disks. This disk is 'the one' I'll travel with if I'm only taking one disk, and the one I am more aggressive backing up. So the top tier Sony files get converted to DNG, and the DNGs go to my main external disk. I should say that I am very often wrong, and the 'worse' photos end up being the ones I decide to use after months or years pass. I separate them upon intake, making a quick judgement of better/worse. Backup - Arq vs Carbon Copy Cloner HD backup for DNGsĪlways rethinking and evolving my backup strategy.Ĭurrently have two tiers of photos.

Doyourclone vs carbon copy